Skip to content
All posts

Silver Drawdowns: Reading the Reset Like a Pro

Silver’s latest downdraft has been a reminder that this “inflation hedge” can trade like a high-beta macro asset when sentiment turns. The Seeking Alpha piece on the silver drawdown focuses on how quickly the metal can give back gains after a strong run, and why products like Aberdeen’s Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) can feel deceptively calm until volatility hits. Meanwhile, the iShares Silver Trust (SLV) historical price tape shows the same signature behavior: sharp rallies followed by equally sharp air pockets when the market reprices real rates and growth expectations. So what’s driving this? It’s less about one headline and more about the intersection of positioning, dollar strength, and the “policy path” narrative that can change in a week.

Here’s the thing: silver is two assets in one—part precious metal, part industrial input—and the drawdown often reveals which side is in control. When the market leans into slower growth or tighter financial conditions, the industrial sensitivity can suddenly dominate, and the trade stops looking like “gold-lite” and starts trading like a cyclical. The Seeking Alpha discussion frames the drawdown as information, not noise—an opportunity to observe where buyers step in, how deep liquidity really is, and whether the market is unwinding leverage or just cooling off. If you’re trading, you’ll want to watch how price behaves around prior breakout zones and whether rebounds are impulsive (strong, fast) or corrective (choppy, overlapping). That distinction is often the difference between a simple pullback and a regime change.


 If you are a serious investor in the real assets space and want to learn more from the most sophisticated investors and leaders in the space, join our Wealthion Real Assets Community today and get access to free videos and articles. And once you join, if you sing up to be a Wealthion Accredited Investor, you may even be eligible for private placement opportunity only available to the most select investors.


Interestingly, the SLV historical series reinforces that silver’s “average” move can be misleading; it’s the tails that matter. Big down days tend to cluster, especially after extended runs where momentum traders and fast money build exposure, and then rush for the exits at the same time. In the context of the Seeking Alpha article, the drawdown becomes a case study in why sizing matters more in silver than in slower-moving defensives: you can be directionally right and still get forced out by volatility. Meanwhile, the vehicles themselves matter—SIVR and SLV are both physically backed approaches, but they can still reflect short-term flows, risk-parity deleveraging, and broad ETF risk-off days. In other words, “physical backing” doesn’t immunize you from market microstructure.

There are also two competing viewpoints embedded in how investors interpret a drawdown like this. The bullish camp tends to see weakness as a setup: silver as a hedge against currency debasement, a beneficiary of long-run electrification and industrial demand, and a catch-up trade when gold leads. The bearish camp sees something else: silver as a crowded macro trade that struggles when real yields rise, the dollar firms, or recession risk dents industrial usage—making rallies prone to sharp mean reversion. So what should you do with that? The Seeking Alpha takeaway is pragmatic—treat the drawdown as a diagnostic tool, not a verdict, and use it to refine entry discipline rather than chase headlines.

Investor takeaways come down to process. First, if you’re using silver as portfolio ballast, you’ll want to stress-test it like an equity proxy during risk-off episodes, because drawdowns can be faster and deeper than many expect. Second, consider structuring exposure—smaller initial sizing, predefined add levels, and a plan for what would invalidate the thesis—because “I’ll just hold” is hardest precisely when volatility spikes. Third, use the historical behavior in SLV as a reality check for how far silver can travel in both directions in short time windows; it’s a market that rewards patience and punishes complacency. And finally, if your thesis is macro (rates, dollar, growth), keep those inputs front and center—silver often moves less on narratives and more on what bond markets and positioning are actually doing.


If you are interested in learning more about owning physical silver or gold, reach out to our partners at Hard Assets Alliance by clicking below. If you would like to join our community of investors interested in learning more about real assets go to wealthion.com/getready and join for access to exclusive interviews, articles and market commentary. 

 


Based on the options market data as of February 19, 2026, the "expected move" for silver is pricing in extreme turbulence ahead of the March 20, 2026, FOMC meeting.

The market has entered a high-volatility regime, with implied volatility (IV) reaching triple digits during the January peak and remaining significantly elevated as traders hedge against a potential "hawkish surprise" from the Federal Reserve.

1. SLV Options: Expected Move Data

The "expected move" represents the one-standard-deviation range (68% probability) that the market expects SLV to trade within by a specific date.

Expiration Date Event / Context Expected Move ($) Expected Range (SLV Price)
Feb 20, 2026 Near-term reset ±$2.53 (3.6%) $67.44 – $72.50
Mar 13, 2026 Pre-Fed Positioning ±$9.15 (13.1%) $60.82 – $79.12
Mar 20, 2026 Fed Meeting Day ±$10.63 (15.2%) $59.34 – $80.60
  • Interpretation: The options market is bracing for a massive 15% swing in either direction by the March Fed meeting. This confirms the point that silver's "average" move is misleading; the market is currently pricing for "tail risks."

2. Implied Volatility & Gamma Levels

  • IV Crush and Spike: Implied volatility on SLV put and call contracts for mid-March is currently between 99% and 103%. For comparison, the 12-month historical realized volatility is only 37%. This massive "volatility premium" means options are currently very expensive to buy.
  • Gamma Squeeze Potential: There is a significant concentration of Open Interest at the $94.00 Put and $104.00 Call strikes. If silver begins to rally toward $100 again, market makers would be forced to buy physical silver or futures to hedge these positions, potentially triggering another "gamma squeeze" similar to the January parabolic run.
  • Put/Call Ratio: The current Put/Call Open Interest ratio for the February 20th expiry is 0.86, indicating a slight bullish bias among retail traders who are "buying the dip" following the recent 36% drawdown.

3. Market Sentiment: The "Warsh" Factor

The primary macro driver for these wide expected moves is the nomination of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair.

  • The Bear Case: If the Fed signals further tightening on March 20th to combat persistent inflation, silver could easily test the lower bound of the expected move ($59.34) as real yields rise and the dollar strengthens.
  • The Bull Case: Conversely, some analysts (like those from AuAg Funds) argue that the recent 30% crash was a "healthy liquidation" and see silver heading toward $133/oz later this year if geopolitical tensions in the Middle East escalate further.
  • Volatility is the feature, not a bug: The ±15% expected move for March proves that "I'll just hold" is a difficult strategy to execute when a single Fed meeting can wipe out or create months of gains.
  • Microstructure Matters: The high IV and the "distribution candle" observed on February 1st (where 2.06 billion shares of SLV traded) show that silver is currently being driven by liquidation and positioning rather than long-term industrial fundamentals.

Investor Takeaway: With the March 20th expected move sitting at ±$10.63, silver is currently a "trader's market." If you are using SLV for portfolio insurance, the market is signaling that you should expect—and size for—swings that look more like a high-growth tech stock than a defensive metal.